The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: The Defiant Parents: Testing’s Discon

Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Richard Hake

Posts: 1,251
From: Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Registered: 12/4/04
Re: The Defiant Parents: Testing’s Discon

Posted: Jan 26, 2014 5:35 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (6.1 K)

Some subscribers to Math-Teach might be interested in a discussion list post "Re: The Defiant Parents: Testing?s Discontents" [Hake (2014)]. The abstract reads:


ABSTRACT: John Denker, in his PhysLrnR post "The Defiant Parents: Testing?s Discontents" called attention to Rebecca Mead's "New Yorker" article of the same name at <>. Mead wrote: ". . . . there is a burgeoning opt-out movement, with parents, teachers, and administrators questioning the efficacy of the tests as they are currently administered, in measuring both the performance of teachers and the progress of students."

Denker wrote (paraphrasing): "There's a medium-sized revolt going on. But it's not a huge revolt because of weak messaging and weak leadership. Specifically the anti-testers haven't come up with a crisp description of what they are revolting against . . . . or where they would like to go instead."

Denker is either oblivious or dismissive of the vigorous leadership, voluminous messaging, and pro-public-/anti-private-education positions of (a) Diane Ravitch and (b) "Fair Test" <> with its discussion list ARN-L with OPEN! archives at <>.

Unfortunately, both Ravitch and "Fair Test" appear to be uninformed regarding the virtues of rigorous measurement of students' higher-order learning by means of zero-stakes *FORMATIVE* (i.e., "designed and used to improve an object, especially when it is still being developed") pre/post testing utilizing Concept Inventories <> which are constructed by disciplinary experts through arduous qualitative and quantitative research ? see e.g., (a) "The Impact of Concept Inventories On Physics Education and Its Relevance For Engineering Education" (Hake, 2011) at <> (8.7 MB); and (b) "Can the Cognitive Impact of Calculus Courses be Enhanced?" (Hake, 2013) at <> (2.7 MB).


To access the complete 61 kB post please click on <>.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University; Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of Deventer, The Netherlands; President, PEdants for Definitive Academic References which Recognize the Invention of the Internet (PEDARRII); LINKS TO: Academia <>; Articles <>; Blog <>; Facebook <>; GooglePlus <>; Google Scholar <>; Linked In <>; Research Gate <>; Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs <>; Twitter <>.

REFERENCES [URL shortened by <> and accessed on 25 Jan 2014.]

Hake, R.R. 214 "Re: The Defiant Parents: Testing?s Discontents" online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at <>.The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists and are also on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at <>.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.