
Re: An alternative Axiom of Infinity?
Posted:
Feb 4, 2014 1:11 PM


On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:39:46 PM UTC5, Peter Percival wrote:
> > Get with the times, Peter. > > > > What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, so 'Cauchy to you'. > > But far more significant than the passage of time is that you seem not > > to understand the difference between a theory and a definition.
Again, Cauchy's recommendation that 0^0 is be left undefined is still widely accepted today, whereas Zermelo's original definition of the successor function is not, not even among set theorists. Get over it, Peter.
Dan Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com Visit my new math blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

