On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:39:46 PM UTC-5, Peter Percival wrote:
> > Get with the times, Peter. > > > > What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, so 'Cauchy to you'. > > But far more significant than the passage of time is that you seem not > > to understand the difference between a theory and a definition.
Again, Cauchy's recommendation that 0^0 is be left undefined is still widely accepted today, whereas Zermelo's original definition of the successor function is not, not even among set theorists. Get over it, Peter.