Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » mathedcc

Topic: Curmudgeonly Comments Concomitant to Corrigan's "To Lecture or Not to Lecture?"
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Richard Hake

Posts: 1,205
From: Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Registered: 12/4/04
Curmudgeonly Comments Concomitant to Corrigan's "To Lecture or Not to Lecture?"
Posted: Feb 15, 2014 2:14 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (9.7 K)

Some subscribers to MathEdCC might be interested in an article "Curmudgeonly Comments Concomitant to Corrigan's 'To Lecture or Not to Lecture?' " [Hake (2014)].

The abstract reads:

*******************************************************

Paul Corrigan has ably reviewed the contentious debate over lecturing. In the present article I borrow from and supplement Corrigan?s "Atlantic" article "To Lecture or Not to Lecture?" at <http://bit.ly/1cGQaKW> and his blog entry "Beyond the Lecturing Debate" at <http://bit.ly/1eKAR0A> so as to include discussion of the following:

1. Lecturing is prevalent but "active learning" is advised by researchers.

2. Nevertheless, some academics defend "lectures."

3. But such academics often advocate lecturing *along with* "active learning."

4. Corrigan distinguishes "lecturing" from "Lecturing."

5. Physics education research emphasizes *higher-level learning* and

distinguishes "lecture" from *passive-student-lecture.*

6. Positive and negative depictions of the lecture.

7. Depictions of "active learning."

8. Literary and YouTube criticism of the passive-student-lecture.

9. Nine anti-passive-student-lecture articles.

10. Twelve pro-lecture articles or books.

11. Should One Lecture or Not Lecture?

******************************************************

To access the complete 2.9 MB article please click on <http://bit.ly/1nA6z5e>.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University; Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of Deventer, The Netherlands; President, PEdants for Definitive Academic References which Recognize the Invention of the Internet (PEDARRII); LINKS TO: Academia <http://bit.ly/a8ixxm>; Articles <http://bit.ly/a6M5y0>; Blog <http://bit.ly/9yGsXh>; Facebook <http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm>; GooglePlus <http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE>; Google Scholar <http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3>; Linked In <http://linkd.in/14uycpW>; Research Gate <http://bit.ly/1fJiSwB>; Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs <http://bit.ly/9nGd3M>; Twitter <http://bit.ly/juvd52>.

"People have nowadays . . . got a strange opinion that everything should be taught by lectures. Now, I cannot see that lectures can do so much good as reading the books from which the lectures are taken. Lectures were once useful; but now, when we can all read, and books are so numerous, lectures are unnecessary." - Samuel Johnson <http://bit.ly/17PdW5Y>, via James Boswell (1791) at <http://bit.ly/qfDXPz>.



REFERENCES [URL shortened by <http://bit.ly/> and accessed on 15 Feb 2014.]

Hake, R.R. 2014. "Curmudgeonly Comments Concomitant to Corrigan's 'To Lecture or Not to Lecture?'," online as a 2.9 MB pdf at <http://bit.ly/1nA6z5e>. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists and are on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at <http://bit.ly/1mhTFxw> with a provision for comments.














Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.