
Re: § 433 The reason for calling matheology matheol ogy
Posted:
Feb 20, 2014 2:09 PM


On Thursday, 20 February 2014 18:39:28 UTC+1, fom wrote:
> To the chagrin of many, including yourself, > > Cantor argues successfully for a metaphyical > > existence of limits as numbers and for a > > transfinite arithmetic.
Cantor's diagonal argument works exclusively in the domain of terminating sequences which he himself as proven to be countable. Therefore the notion of uncountability, as far as it is based on this argument (the others can be disproven too), is far from being successful (although he has dazzled many mathematicians) but is simply selfcontradictory.
Regards, WM

