Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Gravitational waves detected at last
Replies: 1   Last Post: Mar 17, 2014 1:07 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Tom Potter

Posts: 497
Registered: 8/9/06
Re: Gravitational waves detected at last
Posted: Mar 17, 2014 1:07 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


<habshi@anony.net> wrote in message
news:5325e143.382991531@news.giganews.com...
> excerpt guardian.co.uk
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/mar/14/gravitational-waves-big-bang-universe-bicep
>
>
> Stuart Clark
> The Guardian, Friday 14 March 2014 15.33 GMT
> Jump to comments (.)
> Big bang
> Primordial gravitational waves would provide evidence of inflation in
> the moments after the big bang. Photograph: Alamy
> There is intense speculation among cosmologists that a US team is on
> the verge of confirming they have detected "primordial gravitational
> waves" - an echo of the big bang in which the universe came into
> existence 14bn years ago.
>
> Rumours have been rife in the physics community about an announcement
> due on Monday from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. If
> there is evidence for gravitational waves, it would be a landmark
> discovery that would change the face of cosmology and particle
> physics.
>
> Gravitational waves are the last untested prediction of Albert
> Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. They are minuscule ripples in
> the fabric of the universe that carry energy across space, somewhat
> similar to waves crossing an ocean. Convincing evidence of their
> discovery would almost certainly lead to a Nobel prize.
>
> "If they do announce primordial gravitational waves on Monday, I will
> take a huge amount of convincing," said Hiranya Peiris, a cosmologist
> from University College London. "But if they do have a robust
> detection . Jesus, wow! I'll be taking next week off."
>
> The discovery of gravitational waves from the big bang would offer
> scientists their first glimpse of how the universe was born.
>
> The signal is rumoured to have been found by a specialised telescope
> called Bicep (Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization)
> at the south pole. It scans the sky at microwave frequencies, where it
> picks up the fossil energy from the big bang.
>
> For decades, cosmologists have thought that the signature of
> primordial gravitational waves could be imprinted on this radiation.
> "It's been called the Holy Grail of cosmology," says Peiris, "It would
> be a real major, major, major discovery."
>
> Martin Hendry at the University of Glasgow works on several projects
> designed to directly detect gravitational waves. "If Bicep have made a
> detection," he says, "it's clear that this new window on the universe
> is really opening up."
>
> According to theory, the primordial gravitational waves will tell us
> about the first, infinitessimal moment of the universe's history.
> Cosmologists believe that 10-34 seconds after the big bang (a decimal
> point followed by 33 zeros and a one) the universe was driven to
> expand hugely.
>
> Known as inflation, the theory was dreamed up to explain why the
> universe is so remarkably uniform from place to place. But it has
> always lacked some credibility because no one can find a convincing
> physical explanation for why it happened.
>
> Now researchers may be forced to redouble their efforts. "The
> primordial gravitational waves have long been thought to be the
> smoking gun of inflation. It's as close to a proof of that theory as
> you are going to get," says Peiris. This is because cosmologists
> believe only inflation can amplify the primordial gravitational waves
> into a detectable signal.
>
> "If a detection has been made, it is extraordinarily exciting. This is
> the real big tick-box that we have been waiting for. It will tell us
> something incredibly fundamental about what was happening when the
> universe was 10-34 seconds old," said Prof Andrew Jaffe, a cosmologist
> from Imperial College, London, who works on another telescope involved
> in the search called Polarbear.
>
> But extracting that signal is fearsomely tricky. The microwaves that
> carry it must cross the whole universe before arriving at Earth.
> During the journey, they are distorted by intervening clusters of
> galaxies.
>
> "It's like looking at the universe through bubbled glass," said Duncan
> Hanson of McGill University in Montreal, Canada, who works on the
> South Pole Telescope, a rival that sits next to Bicep.
>
> He said the distortion must be removed in a convincing way before
> anyone can claim to have made the detection. The prize for doing that,
> however, would be the pinnacle of a scientific career. "The Nobel
> Prize would be for the detection of the primordial gravitational
> waves."
>
> "Yeah, I would give them a prize," said Jaffe.
>
> The announcement will be made on Monday at 4pm GMT


I suggest that the deadbeat scientists on the public dole
who use billions of the taxpayers dollars

to fork Relativity onto friendly data,
should keep the information to themselves
and use it to make a few bucks in the free market.

Face the facts folks,
rather than start with the enormous amount of extant data
and use it to create models that are useful to society,

deadbeat scientists on the public dole
start with General Relativity,
and use Newtonian and Maxwellian physics
to fork Relativity onto friendly data,

in an effort to use the taxpayer's money to by billion dollar toys,
to promote the fiction that they are privy to powerful, esoteric knowledge,
to attend conferences at interesting places in the world,
and enjoy high pay, great benefits and great retirement income
and immunity from the necessity to generate
any useful products and services.

You won't see deadbeat scientists on the public dole
hyping the fact that the speed of electro-magnetic radiation
is a function of the permittivity and permeability of the medium
as was understood by Maxwell, and as understood and USED
by today's designers of antennas, strip lines, transmissions lines,
wave guides, traveling wave tubes, backward wave oscillators, etc.

--
Tom Potter
https://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.com/
http://prioritize.biz/





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.