Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.symbolic.independent

Topic: NAG compared maple, Mathematica and symbmath
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
drhuang57@gmail.com

Posts: 25
Registered: 1/7/14
NAG compared maple, Mathematica and symbmath
Posted: May 11, 2014 10:46 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I found on org website

The Numerical Algorithms Group Limited 1996.

Here are some problems that Maple and Mathematica cannot
--solve, but SymbMath can do.
-- The following examples came from news on the sci.math.symbolic
--newsgroup in 1991, and were run in Maple V, Mathematica 2.0, or
--SymbMath 2.1.

http://wstein.org/home/wstein/www/home/mhansen/src/axiom/mnt/ubuntu64/input/huang.input

note symbmath moved to http://mathHandbook.com



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.