Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Cumulative MatheRealism Report 15.05.14
Replies:
0




Cumulative MatheRealism Report 15.05.14
Posted:
May 15, 2014 7:37 AM


The Perfosser is not producing much new material. His current plan seems to be to exhaust the enemy by repetition of tedious apparent fallacies in order to launch a surprise attack with brilliant new insights at the appropriate time.
In MatheRealism there will not only be an entirely new theory of the infinitesimal calculus, but also some new laws of arithmetic, such as No. 42 and 41.
42. If z = x + iy and x = 0 then z^2 = x^2 + y^2, thus (iy)^2 = y^2 and 1 = 1.
41. If z = x + iy and x = y then z^2 = x^2 + y^2, thus (1+i)^2 = 2, 2i = 2 and i = 1.
40. Since the antidiagonal cannot have more digits than every entry up to its digit a_nn at the finite place n, the antidiagonal cannot be distinguished from infinitely many rationals too. Not having seen this obvious fact will embarrass thousands of matheologians
39. The notion of finished infinity implies the truth of P and not P.
38. An algorithm is not confined to a finite number of steps
37. Theorem of nonexhaustibility (Mückenheim 2014): We always can "prove" that for every natural number there are much more than 1/epsilon := M rational numbers. Since you can pair one rational, for instance 1/p^n (with p a prime number) with one natural, for instance n, the rationals will *never* be exhausted in this way. And why should we not do this pairing? Have you ever wondered why? Because the rationals will never become exhausted! Hallelujah!
36. "Countable" is nonsense! But if it was (sic) meaningful, then the set of reals was (sic) countable.
35. "Countable" is not a notion of mathematics
34. A real number cannot be sufficiently given by digits unless all digits are given. Otherwise the number is not defined.
33. There is no definition of definition. But every known real number has a definition. Therefore there cannot be more than countably many real numbers
32. Infinite sets do not exist.
31. The amount of information in the universe places a limit on the possible contents of mathematics, namely at most 10^80 imperial gallons.
30. Although all available numbers have a finite contents of information, there is not a greatest number, because, by useful abbreviations, numbers as large as desired can be represented by means of little information. (The Perpetuum Mobile of MatheRealism)
29. In Germany we have not yet sunk to the USlevel of scientific education
28. The decision to accept undefinable numbers does not change anything in mathematics
27. f(t + T) = f(t) is equivalent to f(x + 2pi) = f(x) for any T
1. Countability leads to contradictions in "Mathematics" but not in Matheology.
2. All proofs of the existence of uncountable sets are wrong.
3. Countability is a valid concept in MatheRealism when the "frame" is appropriate.
4. Infinity is always potential, never actual, though neither countable nor uncountable.
5. Cantor caused "disaster to overtake mathematics".
6. 0.111111.... is an abbreviation for 1/9, it is the limit of the implied partial sums
7. It is not possible to list infinite sequences. Irrationals cannot be defined by their digits.
8. If {S_n} is a sequence of sets lim Card(S_n) = Card(lim S_n)
9. Every solution that exists can be identified and can be expressed
10. Set theory is selfcontradictory, but this has no effect on the results of "Mathematics"
11. Every digit belongs to infinitely many rational numbers
12. All elements of mathematical discourse belong to a countable set
13. Set theory is abolished
14. Every expression defines (or points to) itself and probably to some other objects.
15. Every finite expression and every subset of finite expressions is its own definition
16. A list is countable. An alphabet is linearly ordered, i.e., not only wellordered. But uncountable sets cannot be linearly ordered.
17.It would yield nonsense if a function "at infinity" had really any value other than zero.
18. If a set is the union of countably many subsets it has no further subsets, because no elements are available to distinguish these (Principle of the Binary Tree).
19. Elements of a countable set cannot make an uncountable set.
20. For every string that does not yet point to a real number like sqrt(7), we can find a real number which this string points to like sqrt(8). Iinfinitely many occur infinitely often.
21. Infinite expressions do not define anything because they have not a last letter, but every other letter is followed by infinitely many further letters.
22.To claim undefinable Dedekindcuts is an insult to Dedekind
23. The list of defined real numbers has an infinite diagonal. But infinite diagonals like infinite strings of digits do not define anything.
24. Why are the real numbers countable? Because they are not defineable by infinite strings of digits
25. Mathematics is defined by "all that, which can appear in mathematical discourse, dialogue or monologue"
26. numbers like (10^10^10^10^10)!!!!!! belong to the smallest in MatheRealism and there is no greatest number known



