Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: A gambling paradox
Replies: 12   Last Post: Jun 4, 2014 7:06 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
quasi

Posts: 10,208
Registered: 7/15/05
Re: A gambling paradox
Posted: Jun 4, 2014 4:42 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Michael Press wrote:
>Paul wrote:
>>
>>The following consideration appears somewhat paradoxical to
>>me, in the sense of defying one's intuition. As far as I know,
>>it's an original idea.
>>
>>Suppose that a casino offers all games at fair value (and
>>doesn't have any other charges such as an entry fee etc.)
>>For example, there are games where you have a 50% chance
>>of winning an amount equal to your stake etc. Suppose also
>>that all the customers are compulsive gamblers who always
>>gamble everything they have until they lose all their money.
>>My immediate intuition would be that, of course, the casino
>>wins money -- the customers are determined to throw their
>>money away. However, that can't be true because for every
>>transaction, the casino makes an expected gain of zero.
>>So the casino will make zero profit in the long run no
>>matter how hard the customers try to lose. I suppose it's
>>a bit similar to the St. Petersburg paradox. Every once
>>in a while you'd get a customer who keeps winning until
>>the casino closes and that would wipe out the profits.

>
>A player determined to play as long as it takes walks into
>a casino with a bankroll of n. The casino has a bankroll of
>1000n. Most likely the player will loose all his money. In
>fact, the odds against the player are 1000:1.


Change the numbers to:

player has 1 dollar

house has $100 million

Player cannot bet more than the house has left.

All bets offered by the house are at fair odds.

Player must play until he either wins all or loses all (no
early exit is allowed).

Thus, when the game is over, the player has either won
$100 million dollars or lost $1.

Since the individual bets are fair, it follows that regardless
of the amount the player chooses to bet at each stage, the odds
against the player ending up with a profit of $100 million is
exactly $100 million to 1.

But those are _fair_ odds.

Thus, it's like a lottery, except unlike real-world lotteries
which, by design, are very unfair for the player, this is
a fair lottery.

People will be lining up to play -- not just compulsive gamblers
but ordinary people -- the same ones that would typically buy
a lottery ticket.

quasi



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.