The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Taking a larger sample size ...
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Luis A. Afonso

Posts: 4,758
From: LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered: 2/16/05
Taking a larger sample size ...
Posted: Jun 1, 2014 4:10 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Taking a larger sample size ...

Some people do argue that the Null Hypothesis Significance Tests are ´worthless´ because we always are able to attain significant results by simply joining more data. And the result is indisputably correct. They are right. Congratulations!
These fellows, owing their complete presumptuous nature; finally find out the absolute argument they needed to annihilate NHST. For them, really, do not accept the idea that increasing the ´resolution power´ we see things/differences that were invisible/undetected before. I use to call the issue the ´Case of Optical Microscopy against Virus´ that raged all XIX century.
Even for ´exactly simulated´ data, say Normal/Gaussian by the Box-Muller algorithm, we only with probability ZERO find out a sample mean exactly equal to the Population mean value it was chosen for simulations . . .
The reason of dispute is that there are people that are not ready to accept that the conclusions gotten by observation/experiment are contingent/dependent from the conditions under what we act. For them when H0 is false we must have rejection whatever the sample size. Is, not more, than the Classical Logic wrongly used in Random Phenomena area.
Luis A. Afonso

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.