Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: ZFC is shown to be inconsistent
Replies: 6   Last Post: Jun 6, 2014 1:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 891
Registered: 3/3/09
ZFC is shown to be inconsistent
Posted: Jun 5, 2014 8:09 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean has shown ZFC to be

an axiom of ZFC ie axiom of separation outlaws itself thus making ZFC


3. Axiom schema of specification (also called the axiom schema of
separation or of restricted comprehension): If z is a set, and \phi\!
is any property which may characterize the elements x of z, then there
is a
subset y of z containing those x in z which satisfy the property. The
"restriction" to z is necessary to avoid Russell's paradox and its

now Russell's paradox is a famous example of an impredicative
construction, namely the set of all sets which do not contain

the axiom of separation is used to outlaw impredicative statements
like Russells paradox

but this axiom of separation is itself impredicative

"in ZF the fundamental source of impredicativity is the seperation
axiom which asserts that for each well formed function p(x)of the
language ZF the existence of the set x : x } a ^ p(x) for any set a
Since the formular
p may contain quantifiers ranging over the supposed "totality" of all
the sets this is impredicativity according to the VCP this
impredicativity is given teeth by the axiom of infinity "

thus it outlaws itself
thus ZFC contradicts itself

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.