The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Trichotomy of Cardinals
Replies: 10   Last Post: Jul 4, 2014 5:33 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
William Elliot

Posts: 2,637
Registered: 1/8/12
Re: Trichotomy of Cardinals
Posted: Jun 29, 2014 1:56 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, scattered wrote:
> On Saturday, June 28, 2014 5:12:02 AM UTC-4, William Elliot wrote:

> > How is the trichotomy of cardinals equivalent to AxC?
> > Defining the cardinals as done within ZF, as the
> > the initial ordinals, aren't they well ordered?
> > Thusly a proof for AxC?

> Cardinals are defined as equivalence classes under the equinumerable
> equivalence relation. Without AC these equivalence classes can fail
> trichotomy. In this case they are not automatically equivalent to
> certain ordinals.

What set theory? NF, NBG?
Certainly not ZF. How could such classes be defined as sets?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.