The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Trichotomy of Cardinals
Replies: 10   Last Post: Jul 4, 2014 5:33 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 2,720
Registered: 2/15/09
Re: Trichotomy of Cardinals
Posted: Jul 4, 2014 5:20 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 7/4/2014 12:06 PM, Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
> William Elliot <> writes:

>> How is the trichotomy of cardinals equivalent to AxC?
> In the form that says that given any two sets A and B, either A and B
> are equipollent; A and B are not equipollent but A is equipollent to a
> subset of B; or A and B are not equipollent but B is equipollent to a
> subset of A.

>> Defining the cardinals as done within ZF, as the the initial ordinals,
>> aren't they well ordered?

> Sure.

>> Thusly a proof for AxC?
> Observing that a class of ordinals is well-ordered falls somewhat
> short of a proof of the axiom of choice.

2 <-> 3

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.