Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Trichotomy of Cardinals
Replies: 10   Last Post: Jul 4, 2014 5:33 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Aatu Koskensilta

Posts: 2,633
Registered: 6/28/08
Re: Trichotomy of Cardinals
Posted: Jul 4, 2014 5:25 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> writes:

> On 7/4/2014 12:06 PM, Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
>> William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> writes:
>>

>>> How is the trichotomy of cardinals equivalent to AxC?
>>
>> In the form that says that given any two sets A and B, either A and B
>> are equipollent; A and B are not equipollent but A is equipollent to a
>> subset of B; or A and B are not equipollent but B is equipollent to a
>> subset of A.
>>

>>> Defining the cardinals as done within ZF, as the the initial ordinals,
>>> aren't they well ordered?

>>
>> Sure.
>>

>>> Thusly a proof for AxC?
>>
>> Observing that a class of ordinals is well-ordered falls somewhat
>> short of a proof of the axiom of choice.
>>

>
> 2 <-> 3


This is no doubt a pertinent observation, if somewhat obscure.

--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@uta.fi)

"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.