
Re: Discussion with WM  Frustration reaches boiling point (What is not clear?)
Posted:
Jul 6, 2014 1:49 AM


On 7/5/2014 10:15 PM, karl wrote: > Am 05.07.2014 23:46, schrieb mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de: >> On Saturday, 5 July 2014 20:30:33 UTC+2, karl wrote: >>> Am 05.07.2014 19:40, schrieb mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de: >>> >>>> On Saturday, 5 July 2014 17:20:01 UTC+2, karl wrote: >>> >>>>> Am 05.07.2014 17:00, schrieb mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> Yes, there is a contradiction. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Where? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> We have the fact that the sequence does not contain empty sets, when considering the cardinalities, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> and the fact that every rational leaves the sequence. When assuming that "every rational >>> >>>> leaves the sequence" means same as "all rationals leave the sequence", we have a contradiction. >>> >>> >>> >>> All rationals leave the sequence sometimes is no contradiction to the fact that always the sets in the sequence are >>> infinite. >>> >>> Again, where is THE CONTRADICTION? >> >> If always the sets are infinite, then not "all elements can have left". >> "All rationals leave the sequence sometimes" means there is some time when all have left. Note: This is different from "every rational leaves". > > Ok, make a simpler example. > Sequence of sets: > > M_n={n} > All natural numbers leave this sequence of sets sometimes, but at which time all have left? > > >
Right, what is the framework that metrifies them.

