Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: the continuum is not for babies
Replies: 13   Last Post: Jul 11, 2014 2:27 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
ross.finlayson@gmail.com

Posts: 1,188
Registered: 2/15/09
Re: the continuum is not for babies
Posted: Jul 5, 2014 11:02 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 7/5/2014 4:07 PM, ryanbydefault@gmail.com wrote:
> what happens, when you change it to base_3
>


What happens in the representation going from
binary to trinary is that there is an organization
of the space as binary that is somehow being at
once the expansions in binary, and a layout only
in binary, as it were. To go to higher integral
bases, while it allows more terse notations, they
are yet of broader alphabets.

Point being, yes something "occurs" between
binary and trinary in representation of values
of a continuum (here of R[0,1], the unit line segment).

It's a feature of the numbers and their spaces.





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.