Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

help me clarify.

Replies: 3   Last Post: Jul 10, 2014 4:01 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Paul Posts: 780 Registered: 7/12/10
help me clarify.

Posted: Jul 9, 2014 7:13 PM

The wikipedia defines a pi-system on a set omega as being a collection P of subsets of omega such that P is non-empty and such that A intersect B belongs to P whenever A and B belong to P.

However, the article goes on to give another definition that contradicts the previous one -- namely "That is, P is a non-empty family of subsets of omega that is closed under finite intersections."

These are different definitions. The empty intersection of subsets of omega = omega. Therefore the set omega is required to belong to P under the second definition, but need not do so under the first definition.

Does anyone know whether omega is required to belong to P or is the definition not completely standardised?

Thank You,

Paul Epstein

Date Subject Author
7/9/14 Paul
7/9/14 quasi
7/9/14 William Elliot
7/10/14 Paul