Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


robersi
Posts:
2,398
From:
NNY
Registered:
8/18/09


Re: a+b=c mod n^2 for a^n+b^n=c^n
Posted:
Jul 14, 2014 11:44 PM


On Monday, July 14, 2014 11:00:21 PM UTC4, quasi wrote: > robersi730 wrote: > > > > > >proof here > > > > > ><https://sites.google.com/site/thetalkingfly/n21.pdf> > > > > Here's my attempt to state and prove a clear version of what > > I think Simon Robert's paper actually shows. > > > > Proposition: > > > > If a^p + b^p + c^p = 0, where > > > > (1) p is an odd prime > > (2) a,b,c are pairwise coprime nonzero integers > > (3) p does not divide any of a,b,c > > > > then > > > > a^p = a (mod p^2) > > b^p = b (mod p^2) > > c^p = c (mod p^2) > > > > Proof (by Simon Roberts, edited by quasi): > > > > Since c is nonzero, a + b is nonzero. > > > > Since p is odd, (a + b)  (a^p + b^p). > > > > Let > > > > S = a + b > > > > T = (a^p + b^p)/(a + b) > > > > Since S*T = c^p and p doesn't divide c, p doesn't divide > > either of S,T. > > > > Claim gcd(S,T) = 1. > > > > Suppose otherwise. > > > > Let q be a common prime factor of S,T. > > > > S = 0 (mod q) > > > > => b = a (mod q) > > > > Then > > > > T = (a^p + b^p)/(a + b) > > > > = sum((a^(p1k))*(b^k), k = 0..(p1)) > > > > = sum(((1)^k)*(a^(p1k))*((a)^k), k = 0..(p1)) (mod q) > > > > = sum((a^(p1)), k = 0..(p1)) (mod q) > > > > = p*(a^(p1)) (mod q) > > > > But then > > > > T = 0 (mod q) > > > > => p*(a^(p1)) = 0 (mod q) > > > > => (q = p) or qa. > > > > If q = p, then > > > > qT and Tc^p > > > > => qc^p > > > > => qc > > > > => pc, > > > > contrary to hypothesis. > > > > If qa then qb (since qS), contradiction since a,b are > > coprime. > > > > Hence gcd(S,T) = 1, as claimed. > > > > Since S,T are coprime > > > > S*T = c^p, and c nonzero > > > > => S = s^p and T = t^p for some nonzero integers s,t. > > > > By Fermat's little Theorem > > > > a^p = a (mod p) > > > > b^p = b (mod p) > > > > Hence > > > > a^p + b^p = a + b (mod p) > > > > => ST = S (mod p) > > > > [Since p doesn't divide c, > > Sc^p => p doesn't divide S] > > > > => T = 1 (mod p) > > > > => t^p = 1 (mod p) > > > > => t = 1 (mod p) [by Fermat's little Theorem] > > > > => t = 1 + u*p for some integer u > > > > => t^p = (1 + u*p)^p > > > > => t^p = 1 (mod p^2) > > > > [all terms of the expansion of (1 + u*p)^p > > are multiples of p^2 except the constant term] > > > > => T = 1 (mod p^2) > > > > => (a^p + b^p)/(a + b) = 1 (mod p^2) > > > > => a^p + b^p = a + b (mod p^2) > > > > By symmetry of a,b,c, we have > > > > [eq1] a^p + b^p = a + b (mod p^2) > > > > [eq2] b^p + c^p = b + c (mod p^2) > > > > [eq3] c^p + a^p = c + a (mod p^2) > > > > Adding eq1,eq2,eq3 and dividing by 2 (since p is odd) yields > > > > [eq4] a + b + c = 0 (mod p^2) > > > > Then > > > > eq3 + eq1  eq4 => a^p = a (mod p^2) > > > > eq1 + eq2  eq4 => b^p = b (mod p^2) > > > > eq2 + eq3  eq4 => c^p = c (mod p^2) > > > > This completes the proof. > > > > Remarks: > > > > (1) This result applies to case (1) of FLT. > > > > (2) All the logic of the proof is due to Simon Roberts. > > > > (3) My only contribution was to try to make a clear statement > > of what I think Simon Roberts' logic actually proved, and to > > try to make the proof more readable. > > > > (3) Prior to Wiles' Theorem, was this result previously known? > > > > quasi
Thanks very much. That was quick.
Peter Barlow had a book that showed a+b=t^n. I saw a glimpse on the internet about 4 years ago. Don't recall the title.



