Am Montag, 21. Juli 2014 09:38:37 UTC+2 schrieb Virgil:
> > >>> Why don't you look for the error in my proof? Why do you, like Virgil, > > >>> always come up with unsound analogies and unsound results based upon the > > >>> premise of finished infinity? > > > > He, like me and all other proper mathematicians, does not believe in > unfinished sets whose membership is ambiguous
Every matheologian does so, althogh most of them don't know. Well, then |N is finished. Then a proof for all n in |N shows something for all n in |N ad leaves no outcome. My proof shows that every n in |N can be mapped on a set s_n containing all rational numbers =< n which are not indexed by k =< n.
You believe in finished sets. This proof is about the finished set |N. Have you understood?