The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: ? 533 Proof
Replies: 46   Last Post: Aug 4, 2014 8:39 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: ? 533 Proof
Posted: Jul 31, 2014 4:56 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 23:53:07 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> As you one asked me "please formulate them in the correct way like
> forall x in X exists y in Y : y = f(x) in order to avoid misreading".

For every k in |N there is n_0 in |N such that for n >= n_0: (n-k, n] c s_n, i.e., an interval that does not contain rational numbers indexed by n or smaller naturals.

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.