The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Iowa Announces Withdrawal From Smarter Balanced Testing Group
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Jerry P. Becker

Posts: 16,576
Registered: 12/3/04
Iowa Announces Withdrawal From Smarter Balanced Testing Group
Posted: Aug 7, 2014 1:24 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (3.0 K)

From Education Week [American Education's Newspaper of Record],
Thursday, August 7, 2014. See
Iowa Announces Withdrawal From Smarter Balanced Testing Group

By Catherine Gewertz

Iowa says it's withdrawing from the Smarter Balanced Assessment
Consortium, citing the need to design a test that is "the right fit
for Iowa."

In a letter to the consortium dated July 29, reported yesterday by
the blog Caffeinated Thoughts, Gov. Terry Branstad and schools chief
Brad Buck noted that the Iowa legislature created a task force in
2013 to explore the state's assessment options. They said that the
task force would "give careful consideration to all options." [See

But it appears that "all options" doesn't include Smarter Balanced,
because Branstad and Buck asked the consortium to make Iowa's
"withdrawal ... effective immediately" and to drop the state from its
list of members.

Iowa's plan to use a test other than Smarter Balanced isn't a secret;
We reported to you a couple months ago that despite its membership in
Smarter Balanced, Iowa had opted to stick with its own test for 2015.
Education Week's map of states' testing plans shows that while all
but 15 belong to Smarter Balanced or PARCC, only half of the states
actually plan to use those tests in 2015.
Smarter Balanced's map of members still includes Iowa, but presumably
that will soon change, leaving SBAC with 21 state members. [See

Smarter Balanced, however, doesn't see the situation as quite that
cut and dried. The consortium is aware that Iowa won't be using its
test next year, but would not confirm that it has withdrawn from the

"We do not have confirmation of their plans regarding Smarter
Balanced membership," spokeswoman Jacqueline King wrote in an email.
She noted that states that aren't using the test but would still
"like to stay engaged" in the consortium will have the option of
being "affiliate members," she said.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.