YBM
Posts:
846
Registered:
11/27/09
|
|
Re: § 534 Finis
Posted:
Aug 10, 2014 8:24 PM
|
|
Le 10/08/2014 23:24, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de a écrit :
> On Sunday, 10 August 2014 23:20:09 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
>
>
>>> Cantor proves "forall n in |N": the antidiagonal is not in line number n.
>>> In mathematics we use the decimal expansion "forall n in |N": d_n e {1, 2, 3, ..., 9, 0}
>>
>>> Is 0.d_1, d_2, d_3, ... a finite expansion?
>>> Does Cantor's diagonal argument concern a finite list only?
>>> What is the difference between my "forall" and the others?
>>
>>
>>
>> As I said, lets Deal with One of Your Delusions at a Time.
>
> Haha. No, let's deal with the delusions of matheology.
Go to hell Mueckenshit, you are an ass.
|
|
