YBM
Posts:
846
Registered:
11/27/09
|
|
Re: § 534 Finis
Posted:
Aug 10, 2014 8:24 PM
|
|
Le 10/08/2014 23:24, mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de a écrit : > On Sunday, 10 August 2014 23:20:09 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote: > > >>> Cantor proves "forall n in |N": the antidiagonal is not in line number n. >>> In mathematics we use the decimal expansion "forall n in |N": d_n e {1, 2, 3, ..., 9, 0} >> >>> Is 0.d_1, d_2, d_3, ... a finite expansion? >>> Does Cantor's diagonal argument concern a finite list only? >>> What is the difference between my "forall" and the others? >> >> >> >> As I said, lets Deal with One of Your Delusions at a Time. > > Haha. No, let's deal with the delusions of matheology.
Go to hell Mueckenshit, you are an ass.
|
|