
Re: § 534 Finis
Posted:
Aug 12, 2014 5:37 PM


On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:38:40 PM UTC7, muec...@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote: > On Tuesday, 12 August 2014 18:51:08 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:59:08 AM UTC7, muec...@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote:
> > > The potentially infinite set. There is no completed infinite set n and no completed infinite set Q+. Otherwise there must exist q not in the image of the mapping N > Q+. But such a q cannot be found.
> > That make no Sense Whatsoever! > > So, why is that?
> It is a result of mathematics applied to set theory.
That is Not an Explaination. Why is it that "there must exist a not in the image of the mapping N > Q+"?
> It shows that infinity is potential.
But you Assumed N was PI, so what else do you expect?
A Set is Infinite iff There Exist a Proper Subset of that Subset that can be Put into 1:1 Correspondence with said Set.
Now, what's the Definition of "Potential Infinity"?
> Regards, WM
ZG

