On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:47:54 PM UTC-7, muec...@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote: > On Tuesday, 12 August 2014 19:58:29 UTC+2, Martin Shobe wrote:
> > > Cantor's proof requires that there is a point of time where the sequence is "closed".
> > No it doesn't.
> It does. Otherwise the anti-diagonal could be inserted at position 1 while all entries change their position from n to 2n. So with every construction of an antidiagonal infinitely many places (all odd lines) become empty.
Now, that Really Stupid of you! You Really Seem Not to Know what your are Discussing.
> > > Then the anti-diagonal is constructed. But there is no reason to assume the sequence as "closed". In fact, as I have shown in ? 533, this is a false assumption.
> > Your proof in 533 contains at least one error.
> No. And you are not able to show an error.
It has been Pointed Put, and you Refuse to Acknowledge it.