Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: § 534 Finis
Posted:
Aug 15, 2014 10:23 AM


On Friday, August 15, 2014 3:08:33 AM UTC7, muec...@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote: > > > On Thursday, 14 August 2014 02:00:50 UTC+2, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> > >> You don't think the provable nonexistence of unindexed rationals has > > >> any bearing on your claim?
> > > No. If this "provable nonexistence" is accepted together with actual > > > infinity, then we have a contradiction. Why do you think this > > > contradiction would invalidated mathematical proof?
> > The provable nonexistence to which I referred is the falsity of this > > formula: > > exists x c Q+: not(x c image(b))
> together with finished infinity. Therefore your approach is invalid.
You an Idiot. You think that the Fact that No Finite Set can Exhaust All Q means that NO Infinite Set can do so. Go Learn something, you Asshole.
> But you should consider the mathematical proof that I used. It seems you simply try to suppress it.
You Final Conclusion is Not Valid. How many time must how many people show you this?
> Regards, WM
ZG



