Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » mathedcc

Topic: Piaget's Stages? #2
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Richard Hake

Posts: 1,251
From: Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Registered: 12/4/04
Piaget's Stages? #2
Posted: Aug 15, 2014 10:52 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (7.8 K)

Some subscribers to MathEdCC might be interested in a discussion list post "Piaget's Stages? #2" [Hake (2014)]. The abstract reads:


ABSTRACT: Eric Nelson's (2014a) post "Piaget's Stages?" of 7 August 2014 on the CLOSED! PhysLrnR archives at <http://bit.ly/1orXcKo> initiated a thread which on 12 August 07:36-0700 had grown to 23 posts on the PhysLrnR archives at <http://bit.ly/nG318r>.

[NOTE: To access the archives of PhysLnR one needs to subscribe :-(, but that takes only a few minutes by clicking on <http://bit.ly/nG318r> and then clicking on "Subscribe or Unsubscribe." If you're busy, then subscribe using the "NOMAIL" option under "Miscellaneous." Then, as a subscriber, you may access the archives and/or post messages at any time, while receiving NO MAIL from the list!]

In one of the 23 posts, now updated and placed online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at <http://bit.ly/Y8ZumO>, I point to generally laudatory opinions on Piaget's work by experts Philip Adey, John Anderson, Howard Gardner, Alan Kay, Anton Lawson, Robert Sternberg, Ernst von Glasersfeld, and David Klahr.

In addition, aside from his initializing post, Nelson (2014b,c) made two other contributions at <http://bit.ly/1ouGsSQ> and <http://bit.ly/1uP1Zp7> in which he pointed to the work of Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark (KSC) as the definitive word from cognitive science on pedagogical methods. However, not everyone would agree with Nelson's tribute to KSC, as I indicated in "Vague Labels for Pedagogical Methods Should Be Supplemented with Operational Definitions and Detailed Descriptions" [Hake (2014b)] at <http://bit.ly/1jPnKxo>.


To access the complete 61 kB post please click on <http://bit.ly/Ya4c3G>.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University. LINKS TO: Academia <http://bit.ly/a8ixxm>; Articles <http://bit.ly/a6M5y0>; Blog <http://bit.ly/9yGsXh>; Facebook <http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm>; GooglePlus <http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE>; Google Scholar <http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3>; Linked In <http://linkd.in/14uycpW>; Research Gate <http://bit.ly/1fJiSwB>; Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs <http://bit.ly/9nGd3M>; Twitter <http://bit.ly/juvd52>.

"When we say force is the cause of motion we talk metaphysics, and this definition, if we were content with it, would be absolutely sterile. For a definition to be of any use, it must teach us to measure force; moreover, that suffices; it is not at all necessary that it teach us what force is in itself, nor whether it is the cause or the effect of motion." - Henri Poincaré (1905)

REFERENCES [URLs shortened by <http://bit.ly/> and accessed on 14 Aug 2014.]

Hake, R.R. 2014. "Piaget's Stages? #2," online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at <http://bit.ly/Ya4c3G>. The abstract and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several discussion lists and are also on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at/<http://bit.ly/1l7zhQ3>.

Poincaré, H. 1905. "Science and Hypothesis," Walter Scott Publishing; online at <http://bit.ly/9hVfA8> thanks to the "Mead Project." A Wikipedia entry on Poincaré is at <http://bit.ly/b4jGVS>.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.