Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: How to obtain an equation of a polygon
Replies: 16   Last Post: Aug 22, 2014 12:10 AM

 Search Thread: Advanced Search

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Dave L. Renfro Posts: 4,792 Registered: 12/3/04
How to obtain an equation of a polygon
Posted: Aug 19, 2014 4:13 PM
 Plain Text Reply

Gary Tupper wrote (in part):

http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=9558358

> Well, if you have used the software to graph say (y-x+3)(x-y^2)=0
> or (y-|x|)(y+3)=0 & some similar such {exprA * exprB * exprC}=0 etc.,
> then it would not be unreasonable to ask the student on a test to
> provide the equation of the '+' coordinate axes.

Note: I'm starting a new thread because what I'm posting might be
of sufficient interest to others (lurking now or those stumbling
on this at some future time) that I'd rather not burry it in the
thread "Software We've Liked" that Gary Tupper's post is in.

This reminds me of something neat I came across a few years ago.
This was after I left teaching, so I never tried it in a classroom,
but it seems to me that it could be used to make a worksheet for a
possibly engaging one-day project for precalculus students to work
on in groups. The method below shows how you can obtain an explicit
equation whose graph is a specified polygon in the coordinate plane.

I'll begin by making a couple of observations on how one can
build new graphs from existing graphs.

Let F and G be the graphs (considered as subsets of the coordinate
plane) of f(x,y) = 0 and g(x,y) = 0. Then, using * for multiplication,
we have the following two useful ways of obtaining other sets
as graphs of an equation:

"F union G" is the graph of f(x,y) * g(x,y) = 0

"F intersect G" is the graph of |f(x,y)| + |g(x,y)| = 0

For intersection you can also use the graph of
[f(x,y)]^2 + [g(x,y)]^2 = 0 if you want to avoid using
the absolute value function (e.g., if you wanted the
end result to be the zero-set of a 2-variable polynomial).

The basic idea is to determine how to obtain an equation
whose graph is any specified line segment, and then use
the first building principle above to obtain an equation
whose graph is any specified set that can be expressed as
a finite union of line segments.

I'll show how to obtain an equation for the line segment
with endpoints (1,0) and (0,1) by a method that can be easily
adapted to obtain an equation for a line segment with
any specified endpoints (a,b) and (c,d).

First, consider the line passing through (1,0) and (0,1).

Write this in the form of f(x,y) = 0. One possibility
is x + y - 1 = 0.

Consider what additional conditions need to be imposed so
that we get the line segment with endpoints (1,0) and (0,1),
rather than the whole line. In the case of x + y - 1 = 0,
we want x >= 0 and x <= 1.

Now let's express these inequality conditions as equations.
One way to do this is |x| - x = 0 (for x >= 0)
and |x - 1| + (x - 1) = 0 (for x <= 1).

This comes directly from the definition of absolute value.
Recall |u| = u iff u >= 0, and |u| = -u iff u <= 0.

The line segment with endpoints (1,0) and (0,1) arises as
the intersection of these three sets -- the graph of
x + y - 1 = 0, the graph of |x| - x = 0 (gives a half-plane),
the graph of |x - 1| + (x - 1) = 0 (gives another half-plane).
Therefore, this intersection (i.e. the desired line segment)
can be obtained as the graph of

|x + y - 1| + ||x| - x| + ||x - 1| + (x - 1)| = 0

A similar method can be used to obtain the line segment
with endpoints (a,b) and (c,d) as the graph of an equation
of the form f(x,y) = 0.

For polygons (or anything that can be expressed as a union
of finitely many line segments in the plane), you just obtain
equations f_1(x,y) = 0, f_2(x,y) = 0, ..., f_n(x,y) = 0 for
each of the line segments, and then the desired planar set
will be the graph of

f_1(x,y) * f_2(x,y) * ... * f_n(x,y) = 0.

Dave L. Renfro

Date Subject Author
8/19/14 Dave L. Renfro
8/19/14 Robert Hansen
8/19/14 Robert Hansen
8/19/14 Gary Tupper
8/20/14 GS Chandy
8/20/14 Robert Hansen
8/20/14 Gary Tupper
8/20/14 Robert Hansen
8/20/14 GS Chandy
8/20/14 Robert Hansen
8/20/14 Dave L. Renfro
8/20/14 GS Chandy
8/20/14 GS Chandy
8/21/14 Dave L. Renfro
8/21/14 Robert Hansen
8/22/14 Bishop, Wayne
8/22/14 Bishop, Wayne

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.