Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIANS
Replies: 4   Last Post: Aug 22, 2014 8:55 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,348
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIANS
Posted: Aug 22, 2014 4:13 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

> http://edition.cnn.com/fyi/backgrounders/relativity.math/index.html
>
> Stephen Hawking: "In that 1905 paper, Einstein pointed out that because you could not detect whether or not you were moving through the ether, the whole notion of an ether was redundant. Instead, Einstein started from the postulate that the laws of science should appear the same to all freely moving observers. In particular, observers should all measure the same speed for light, no matter how they were moving."



Hawking wrote a similar notion in Brief History Of Time, that it may be the make up of the universe that prevents full knowledge of a Unified Theory being possible.

Uncertainty is at the heart of scientific method. The speed of light is so absurdly fast we really only measure the effects, and must exercise lateral thinking to fit the often counter-intuitive observations.

If gravity is explained as a macro-centrifugal force, like a spinning wheel Universe then it would always be in the same direction at any solar system scale. Hence the Universe itself must be 'moving' and instead of the force of gravity being away from the center of the wheel it is towards the average nearest central mass. In our real world, only a sponge like material has this property of summative non-local influence on the curvature of the fabric at a distance.

However at the more concrete levels of the universe in 'Quantum Foam' non-local pairing of particles occurs all the time. So an algorithmic method of gravity without a 'physical' ether is apparent. In fact to compute the gravity of n particles in a system is a O(n^2) problem, and the probability of 2 particles selected at random having entanglement is O(n^1/2), see Birthday Attack. Therefore as the number of particles increases, the gravity calculation remains at O(n) ensuring a scalable function.

Have You Seen www.MUD.com/news Today ?




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.