On Saturday, November 11, 2017 at 1:03:34 PM UTC+3, Zelos Malum wrote: > >How many fake unreal numbers > > All numbers are equally "fake" and "unreal" because they are ALL abstract constructions.
Who taught you that stupid? wonder! > > >However to see this so clearly, you would require advanced programs for more digits finding
I see, and what is the ratio of the number of correct digits to all number of digits that alleged advanced program would be able to find for any irrational number (excluding the constructible numbers)? wonder! > > Except a program doesn't define anything.
How can a program define things if you truly can't for sure?
But, hey, there is still a hope in the artificial intelligence once developed enough by Engineers to overcome your alike for sure > > >And when the so elementary proof of Fermat?s last theorem is revealed, then so large part of fake mathematics would be thrown out immediately!
This is a must > > Why should things be thrown out just because you are too stupid to understand it?
I may appear as a stupid just because I'm trying to tame a fictional Troll as you
No, you fictional and well-exposed MORON, this is mixing up reality with unreality just to run away from punishment for sure