The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2, 4,
10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)

Replies: 23   Last Post: Apr 12, 2017 12:28 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com

Posts: 3,654
Registered: 2/21/15
Re: getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2,
4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)

Posted: Apr 12, 2017 12:28 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

well, hm

> Did Euler use dM's result? noticing that if f(x)=cosx + i*sinx then
> df/dx = i*f(x) an equation he had already solved.
>
> HTH
> JJ




Date Subject Author
4/7/17
Read getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2, 4,
10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Stirling had this/ getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n
in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5??
(maybe 2.71...)
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Stirling had this/ getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n
in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5??
(maybe 2.71...)
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Stirling had this/ getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n
in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5??
(maybe 2.71...)
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Stirling had this/ getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n
in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5??
(maybe 2.71...)
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Re: Stirling had this/ getting rid of the factorial by replacing with
n^n in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5??
(maybe 2.71...)
Python
4/7/17
Read Stirling had this/ getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n
in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5??
(maybe 2.71...)
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Stirling had this/ getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n
in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5??
(maybe 2.71...)
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Replacing functions by a Sequence such as Y= x function becomes 1, 1,
1, ... or 10, 10, 10, .... what is the function 1,2,3,4, ....??
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Re: Replacing functions by a Sequence such as Y= x function becomes
1, 1, 1, ... or 10, 10, 10, .... what is the function 1,2,3,4, ....??
Don Redmond
4/7/17
Read can Don admit his mistake on Harmonic Series-- for it never diverges
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Re: Replacing functions by a Sequence such as Y= x function becomes
1, 1, 1, ... or 10, 10, 10, .... what is the function 1,2,3,4, ....??
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/10/17
Read Re: Stirling had this/ getting rid of the factorial by replacing with
n^n in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5??
(maybe 2.71...)
abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com
4/7/17
Read Re: Stirling had this/ getting rid of the factorial by replacing with
n^n in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5??
(maybe 2.71...)
Karl-Olav Nyberg
4/8/17
Read 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . .
abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com
4/8/17
Read Re: 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . .
abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com
4/8/17
Read Re: 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . .
abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com
4/9/17
Read Re: getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2,
4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)
Timsn274
4/9/17
Read Re: getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2,
4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)
bursejan@gmail.com
4/9/17
Read Re: getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2,
4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)
R.J.Chapman
4/10/17
Read Re: getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2,
4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/10/17
Read Re: getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2,
4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)
Timsn274
4/11/17
Read Re: getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2, 4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)
John Jones
4/12/17
Read Re: getting rid of the factorial by replacing with n^n in sequence 2,
4, 10, 26, 64, 163, . . . and a convergency constant 2.5?? (maybe 2.71...)
abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.