Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: The follies of Dedekind and Cauchy with respect to "real numbers" exposed
Posted:
Sep 15, 2017 2:22 AM


On Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 7:53:27 PM UTC+2, John Gabriel wrote: > On Thursday, 14 September 2017 02:05:41 UTC4, zelos...@outlook.com wrote: > > >As you can see, these do not have a zero componentwise difference > > really? Let's try shall we? > > > > Your first one is > > <4+(10.5^n)> > > the second one is > > <4+(11/3^n)> > > Their differens is > > <4+(10.5^n)(4+(11/3^n))>=<1/3^n1/2^n> > > which is a null sequence as I said. So you cannot even do basic algebra or understand definitions. > > Laughing my arse off at you dumb fool. If what you claim were true, then ALL Cauchy sequences are NULL componentwise, you absolute MORON!!!! Bwaaa haaa haaaaa. > > Don't get used to me responding to you dipshit. I piss and shit on dumb asses like you. > > <vomit>
As we can see you cannot understand things, not all are nullsequences and not all sequences have a componentwise differens that is a null sequence.
Why don't you actually learn things before you try to act superior? It makes your fakery so false.



