Sir Failure of Plutonium <email@example.com> doth faileth again thusly:
>On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 11:05:20 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Sir Failure of Plutonium <firstname.lastname@example.org> doth faileth thusly: >> >> >On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 12:26:33 AM UTC-5, Jan wrote: >> >> >> Yeah yeah, that's all you can do: scream at other people whenever they >> >> simply ask you to back up what you say. >> >> >Now the above two proofs by me are >> >> TWO proofs? So far you haven't provided ONE proof! >> >> Please provide an actual proof! >> All you do is claim you have a proof and post fantasies of mass firings >> of university math departments because you KNOW they know the Dandelin >> Proof is correct and the ellipse is a conic section.
>Boston baked bean loser of science Moroney says MIT math dept agrees with him::
You lie. Why do you lie?
And once again, you fail: You pick another university in the Boston area and assume I am associated with it. FAIL!
Current score: 4 failures, ~4,348 universities (in the US) to go.
If you actually have a proof that a conic section is never an ellipse, POST IT!!! If not, admit your mistake.
>MIT >math dept
And yet another list, posted without explanation. Why do kooks always post lists like this, no explanation, just a list.
Do you really think anyone listed will actually agree with you?