Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Early (1930's) work on arithmetic progressions
Replies:
10
Last Post:
Oct 1, 2017 11:40 AM



Paul
Posts:
780
Registered:
7/12/10


Early (1930's) work on arithmetic progressions
Posted:
Sep 27, 2017 3:09 PM


https://dml.cz/?/1033?/122006/CasPestMatFys_06719384_3.pdf I'm trying to understand some of the early work on arithmetic progressions. In the above paper, I don't understand how van der Waerden's theorem is used to prove (8) on page 236. It's true that one of the sets in the partition will contain arithmetic progressions of length k. But, in the partition of the integers from 1 to r_k * n_0, an A_i will have lots of members which are not in the a_i maximal sequence. So I don't see how an A_i with an arithmetical progression of length k establishes a contradiction.
Many thanks for your help.
Paul Epstein



