7777777
Posts:
320
Registered:
11/4/16


Re: It is a very bad idea and nothing less than stupid to define 1/3 = 0.333...
Posted:
Oct 7, 2017 2:08 AM


torstai 5. lokakuuta 2017 16.12.34 UTC+3 burs...@gmail.com kirjoitti: > There is no S(oo), there is no index n=oo.
fail.
There is S(?), there is index n = ? look at: http://amsi.org.au/ESA_Senior_Years/SeniorTopic1/1d/1d_2content_5.html
> Only lim n>oo S(n), which happens is can > > be written as sum_i=1^oo a(i)
you contradict yourself. sum_i=1^oo a(i) is S(?)
> > Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2017 05:56:03 UTC+2 schrieb 7777777: > > keskiviikko 4. lokakuuta 2017 17.31.48 UTC+3 burs...@gmail.com kirjoitti: > > > Still struggling with "S=Lim S", your own > > > blunder, bird brain John Gabriel birdbrains? > > > > why don't you answer to my criticism? How do you end up with S(?) = 1? > > You have only shown how S(?) = 0.(9) > > Do you just simply put 0.(9) = 1, but why? It is just because you say so? > > In doing so, can you just put everything that you want to be equal to anything you want? Just because that's what you want.

