The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
Replies: 29   Last Post: Oct 22, 2017 1:40 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
LudovicoVan

Posts: 4,157
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
Posted: Oct 21, 2017 8:42 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 2:31:25 AM UTC+2, burs...@gmail.com wrote:

> Well I doubt that FOL is based on such a paradigma
> as reduction.


The problem is *not* with FOL or any tool, you stupid cunt. At least do not
put words in my mouth.

*Plonk*

Julio


Date Subject Author
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
bursejan@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that JG is INSANE is irrefutable.
Dan Christensen
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that JG is INSANE is irrefutable.
Dan Christensen
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
Jan Burse
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
bursejan@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
bursejan@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
bursejan@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
bursejan@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
bursejan@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
bursejan@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
bursejan@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
bursejan@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
LudovicoVan
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
genmailus@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
genmailus@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
genmailus@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
genmailus@gmail.com
10/21/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
Brian Tenneson
10/22/17
Read Re: The evidence that Euler defined S=Lim S is irrefutable.
zelos.malum@gmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.