He thinks you have to say "and two distinct points"
On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 10:55:18 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:08:09 AM UTC-6, Peter Percival wrote: > Dan Christensen wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:47:32 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > >> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:27:19 AM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > >>>> PAGE58, 8-3, True Geometry / correcting axioms, 1by1 tool, angles of logarithmic spiral, conic sections unified regular polyhedra, Leaf-Triangle, Unit Basis Vector > >>>> > >>>> The axioms that are in need of fixing is the axiom that between any two points lies a third new point. > >>> > >>> The should be "between and any two DISTINCT points." > >>> > >> > >> What a monsterous fool you are > >> > > > > OMG. You are serious. Stupid and proud of it. > > And yet Mr Plutonium is right. Two points are distinct (else they would > be one) and it is not necessary to say so. >
DAN CHRISTENSEN is so dumb, so insane in math, that he believes OR is add in Logic, but even a ten year old child knows that 1 and 2 is 3, not to Dan's insanity that 1 or 2 is 3.
I recommend Dan be kicked out of sci.math and his website that propagandizes insane logic be torn down.
Canada owes as much to its children to keep a kook like Dan away from education.