The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Math Topics » discretemath

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: oldest discrete mathematics
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  

Posts: 104
Registered: 12/3/04
oldest discrete mathematics
Posted: Sep 24, 1999 7:38 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Dear List members:

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the list owner
for implementing a long overdue list. To begin at the beginning,
I would like to propose the oldest known descrete mathematics,
at least within the written record of the Western Tradition.

Exactly writing a rational number, p/q, as a unit fraction series
was well known in the Egyptian Old Kingdom and plausibly the oldest
discrete mathematics. We have only fragments of Old Kingdom texts,
however, a Horus-Eye doubling methodology, also used for Egyptian
multiplicaiton, is well described in several Middle Kingdom texts.
The most famous is the Ahmes Papyrus, or as many prefer to title it,
the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus (RMP).

The RMP begins with two tables, the 2/n and n/10, all exact unit
fraction series. I will describe the 2/nth table, as built upon
another Middle Kingdom text, a series of 26 1/p and 1/pq series found
in Egyptian Mathematical Leather Roll,EMLR, also purchased by Henry
Rhind around 1858 in Egypt.

The EMLR used a simple 1/pq conversion rule 11 times, a rule that was
used in the RMP 2/nth table 24 times. Line 1.0 of the EMLR stated:

1/8 = 1/10 + 1/40

an exact series that could have been created by several methods.
I prefer to offer:

1/pq = 1/A x A/pq

as the historical series, following A = 5 and A = 25


1/8 = 1/5 x 5/8

= 1/5 x (1/2 + 1/8)

= 1/10 + 1/40

as also used in the RMP with A = (p + 1) and (p + q)

The RMP A = (p + 1) case was used in 22 of 24 series, with A = (p + q)
for 2/35 and 2/91.

The one 2/pq series that did not use this common EMLR and RMP rule
was 2/95. The series was computed by 2/19 x 1/5 with 2/19 being
computed by a 2/p rule.

The RMP 2/p rule was first re-discoverd by Hultsch in 1895, a
method that used the aliquot parts of the first partition A,
following the algebraic identity rule:

2/p - 1/A = (2A -p)/Ap

with A = 12 being mentally selected (by Ahmes and/or by someone
that created the table 200 years earlier).

Re-stating the 2/p rule, in the form,

2/p = 1/A + (2A -p)/Ap

and analyzing the 2/19 case, with A = 12, consider:

2/19 = 1/12 + (24 - 19)/(12*19)

with 2A - p = 5 being computed by two alternative sets of
divisors of 12. The two are (3 + 2) and (4 + 1), with Ahmes
selecting ( 3 + 2), or

2/19 = 1/12 + (3 + 2)/(12*19)

= 1/12 + 1/76 + 1/114

(which, of course allows 2/95 = 1/5 x 2/19 = 1/60 + 380 + 1/570,
as the RMP lists).

Interestingly, Ahmes always selects largest last term series for from
the available set of aliquot parts. Note also that no more than
three aliquot parts of A were used in the 2/nth table.

Finally, the last 2/p series to be explain in the RMP is 2/101.
This 'odd' RMP series is not odd for the EMLR, having been used
four times (as I recall) following the simple rule:

2/p = 1/p x (1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/6)


for 2/101 = 1/101 x (1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/6)

= 1/101 + 1/202 + 1/303 + 1/606

Again, I thank the list owner for this opportunity. All comments,
pro and con, will be graciously received, and commented on -
publically or privatively (depending upon your wishes).

Regards to all,

Milo Gardner
Sacramento, Calif.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.