The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Math Topics » geometry.pre-college

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Geometry course
Replies: 3   Last Post: Dec 28, 1994 8:43 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 4
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Geometry course
Posted: Dec 28, 1994 12:07 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

tom foregger wrote:

>What I would like to find out is:
>1. Is the current geometry course in your district substantially the

>as what I was taught or has the content been watered down
>with a deemphasis on proofs?
>If proofs are being deemphasized, why is this being done?

>2. Does your district offer 8th graders a geometry course?
>If so, what is the entry criteria?
>What is the first grade at which a student can take a geometry course
>with proofs?

Tom: the 2nd question first. In our district we offer 8th grade Algebra I
and 9th grade geometry. I once taught, in another district, a successful
7th grade Algebra I course. It was suceessful only because I had a group
of very highly motivated students. Most of them gave up thier lunch
period to come to a help session I ran on a regular basis. The Math
Coordinator tried to expand the course to 5 sections the next year. It
was a disaster.

As to the first question, most of our department uses a tradional trext
book with a strong emphasis on proofs. I am using Serra's Discovering
Geometry which starts students off by writing paragraph proofs then leads
into flowchart proofs, my favorite. Students are introduced to formal
deductive reasoning at the end of the book and finish off with a rogorous
look at formal proofs. I believe it is the superior approach. Students
still do proofs, but after their are ready. When I was in high school,
too long ago, we had a similar curriculum as you described. We also had a
lot fewer students in our school that followed a Alg I-Geometry_AlgII
sequence. I do not feel that many of today's students are ready for
formal proofs by the 2nd chapter of their geometry book. I am a strong
believer in the use of proofs but I feel students need to be better
prepared first. There is a good article in the Jan 95 issue of the
Mathematics Teacher on research about student's readiness for proofs:
"Geometry and Proof" by Micahel Battista and Douglas Clemments

Michael P Goldsmith
Concord High School
Concord, NH

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.