The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Math Topics » geometry.pre-college

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: FW: Congruent triangles Revisited. With corrections from previous nonsense post.
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
John A Benson

Posts: 85
Registered: 12/3/04
FW: Congruent triangles Revisited. With corrections from previous nonsense post.
Posted: Dec 7, 1999 2:26 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
winmail.dat (2.4 K)

Sorry. I really screwed up the previous post about SSA. I have corrected it
here, I think.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson-John [mailto://]
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 10:49 PM
> To:
> Subject: Congruent triangles
> Actually, there is an angle, side side congruence relationship. I do not
> think it is a postulate, I think it is a theorem. It is angle, small
> side, large side. If the SIDE adjacent to the angle is smaller than
> the SIDE opposite to the angle angle, or congruent to it, then the
> triangles must be congruent because the opposite side cannot "swing" under
> the angle to form two triangles. Hypotenuse leg is a special case of the
> theorem. I always teach this to my students and then ask them why they
> think it is not included in the text. I have found it useful in at least
> one quite difficult problem I was trying to solve.
> John Benson
> Evanston Township High School 715 South Boulevard
> 1600 Dodge Avenue Evanston Il 60202-2907
> Evanston IL 60204 847) 328-8019 (phone & fax)
> (847) 424-7600 (847) 226-7713 ( cell)

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.