Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: amusing problem
Posted:
May 28, 2003 9:07 AM
|
|
In article <20030527004424.62160.qmail@web9304.mail.yahoo.com>,
binary_freedom@yahoo.com (Binary Freedom) wrote:
> now i dont even know this is geometry or not, but the word "trisecular"
> sounds geometry ^.^' You'll see why it is amusing after you read it!
>
> If a trisecular deunification within the Strumthurn-Clyde group is
> transgressional beyond the zone of subangular tonistics,
> prove that the neoistic totality cannot be a subsidiary of the congruent
> nano-flex classificationism.
>
*
Smith-Slattery answered this question in, I think, 1887 before the
Hartley-McMine-Slobodosky continuum axioms were proposed.
Keep up with the literature, if you can.
earle
*
|
|
|
|
