Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: amusing problem
Posted:
May 28, 2003 9:07 AM


In article <20030527004424.62160.qmail@web9304.mail.yahoo.com>, binary_freedom@yahoo.com (Binary Freedom) wrote:
> now i dont even know this is geometry or not, but the word "trisecular" > sounds geometry ^.^' You'll see why it is amusing after you read it! > > If a trisecular deunification within the StrumthurnClyde group is > transgressional beyond the zone of subangular tonistics, > prove that the neoistic totality cannot be a subsidiary of the congruent > nanoflex classificationism. >
* SmithSlattery answered this question in, I think, 1887 before the HartleyMcMineSlobodosky continuum axioms were proposed.
Keep up with the literature, if you can.
earle *



