Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
Inactive
»
k12.ed.math
Topic:
Re: Math, self-esteem, and multi-cultural approaches (Was: Re: , International mathematics and science scores (U.S. 4th graders second in world)
Replies:
45
Last Post:
Mar 11, 1998 9:24 AM
|
 |
|
|
|
Re: ability grouping
Posted:
Feb 19, 1998 2:29 AM
|
|
The definitive article analyzing all of the research related to grouping was printed in the HARVARD EDUCATION REVIEW, Vol. 66, No. 4 Winter 1996, pp 797-828. The article titled, "Sustained Inquiry in Education: Lessons from Skills grouping and Class Size" was written by Frederick Mosteller, Richard Light, and Jason Sachs. I'll provide the text for the intro to this article, but before I do I think that it's important to realize that the only alternatives aren't heterogeneous groups vs. tracking. Joplin grouping which is one variation of grouping this article describes and which is rarely used, remains the most effective type of grouping I've personally witnessed in my 20 years in education. This article (filled with any and all referencesto studies on grouping) is described as follows:
"In this article the authors explore the nature of the empirical evidence that can inform school leaders' key decisions about how to organize students within schools: Should students be placed in heterogeneous classes or tracked classes? AWhat is the impact of class size on student learning? How does it vary? Since tracking (or skills grouping, as the authors prefer to call it) is widely used in U.S. schools, the authors expected to find a wealth of evidence to support the efficacy of the practice. Surprisingly, they found only a handful of well-designed studies expbenefits of tracking, and of these, the results were equivocal. Witrh regard to class size, the authors describe the Tenn. class size study, using it to illustrate that large, long-term, randomized controlled field trials can be carried out successfully in education. The Tenn. study demonstrates convincingly that student achievement is better supported in smaller classes in grades K-3, and that this enhanced achievement continues when the students move to regular-size classes in the fourth grade and beyond. The authors suggest in conclusion that education would benefit from a commitment to sustained inquiry through well-designed, randomized controlled fireld trials of education innovations. Such sustained inquiry could provide a source of solid evidence on which educators could base their decisions about how to organize and support student learning in classes and schools."
---------------------------- message approved for posting by k12.ed.math moderator k12.ed.math is a moderated newsgroup. charter for the newsgroup at www.wenet.net/~cking/sheila/charter.html submissions: post to k12.ed.math or e-mail to k12math@sd28.bc.ca
|
|
|
|