|
|
Re: Reply to Tapio on Jan's Rubbish
Posted:
Apr 28, 1998 4:28 PM
|
|
In a previous article, enoether@aol.com (ENoether) says:
oh; I thought you were referring to Biblical Kodes (sik !-)
>No. One side has a correct argument, and some are too stuborn to concede their
>positions. It might be different if someone were rigourously defining a new (or
>different) set model, or presenting some other rigourous argument, but some
>individuals are clinging to their unsupported intuition in spite of the
>rigourous and precise arguments against their claims.
> There is nothing "defective" with our definition ( NOT "notion") of limit.
>If you (EE) are going to continue to post on this NG, would you at least start
>posting some rigourous arguments, instead of this silly crap about infinte
>spoons in a room and whether or not a computer can calculate
>sin(10^{-100000000}). Frankly, you're single-handedly bringing the average
>quality of posts in here way down.
--
member, African Civil Rights Movement -- extirpate retrocolonialism!
(No **** is good ****; eh?... http://inet.uni-c.dk/~sch-inst/pres.html)
<DELETIVES EXPLETED> http://www.tarpley.net </DELETIVES EXPLETED>
<Brian Hutchings, Living Space Programs, Santa Monica College>
|
|
