The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » Historia-Matematica

Topic: [HM] Variation/Parameter
Replies: 2   Last Post: Feb 28, 1999 10:37 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Michael Deakin

Posts: 64
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: [HM] Variation/Parameter
Posted: Feb 28, 1999 7:13 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

There have been several responses to my posting on variation of
parameters, so I decided to reply to the list as a whole.

First, and sadly, I have run out of reprints of the article I cited,
so I'll give its gist below.

Lagrange did have a version of variation of parameters, but it bore
little resemblance to what we know by that term today. That
connection was made by Cauchy, and our use of the technique derives
from Cauchy.

I have few details of the anticipation by Euler. It is mentioned by
Enestrom in a footnote to Vessiot's article in the Encyclopedie
(French, not German edition). See Enc. Sci. Math. 2(16), pp. 58ff,
f/n 166. I have had no time since my last posting to add to this.
The equation discussed was


and it arose in connection with a discussion of tides. This seems
very close to modern usage, but the Euler source is an obscure one.

I was unaware of the references to Bernoulli and Leibniz. I'll try
to follow them up -- when I get time! (A new term has just begun and
we all have massive teaching loads!)

Lagrange introduced his technique in 1774 in a discussion of
planetary orbits (Oeuvres 4, 109-147) but expanded on it in 1781
(Oeuvres 5, 123ff). For Cauchy, see Oeuvres Completes 2 ser. 6,

Here, from a later text (Vol 3 of Price's 1856 Treatise on
Infinitesimal Calculus), is an example of Lagrange's approach, which
is essentially a perturbation technique.

Consider the equation of resisted fall


and the related unperturbed equation


The latter has the solution


so for the former set




In the case of the simpler equation we have


and so for the perturbed equation, we expect


For consistency impose the condition


Putting this all together


and I leave it to you all to complete the work and reach the full

As I said, the roots of the method are present in this example (as in
Lagrange's more complicated ones) but the routine technique we use
today was extracted from it by Cauchy.

Which is not to say that Euler, Bernoulli and Leibniz didn't
also independently and earlier entertain similar thoughts!

Mike Deakin

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.