The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » Historia-Matematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: [HM] Companion Encyclopedia
Replies: 13   Last Post: Apr 14, 2001 11:45 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
J.G.Fauvel (John Fauvel)

Posts: 25
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: [HM] Companion Encyclopedia
Posted: Mar 30, 2001 9:51 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Victor Katz's review of the Companion Encyclopedia was in Historia
Mathematica vol 24 (1997), pp. 445-452. Responses from Ivor
Grattan-Guinness and from Jeremy Gray appeared in vol 25 (1998), pp. 94-97.
Katz's critique seemed in essence to be saying that it should have been a
different sort of book, while Grattan-Guinness and Gray pointed out that it
succeeded in what it set out to achieve, namely to convey the range and
variety of past mathematical developments and to provide bibliographical
leads for those wanting to take any particular matter further.

I tend to side with Grattan-Guinness and Gray on this matter. The world of
historical scholarship is richer and better for the existence of the
Companion Encyclopedia. Of course if Routledge had been willing to finance
a book of 3600 pages rather than merely 1800 pages then each article could
have been twice the length, and the book would doubtless have been even
richer and better. Would that we lived in such a world!

John Fauvel

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.