Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » mathedu

Topic: Topic for discussion
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Jerry Uhl

Posts: 1,267
Registered: 12/3/04
Topic for discussion
Posted: Jan 7, 1997 12:13 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I think our whole math curriculum is in doldrums. Math offering across the
country math offerings have remained nearly constant for more than 30
years. During this time, I have seen math enrollment steadily decrease.
Students just aren't interested the way they used to be.

When I asked (the late) Lee Rubel about this, he said: "Our trouble is that
we are teaching mathematics history and not mathematics."

Bill Thurston once gave his view on what's wrong:
"We go through the motions of saying for the record what the students
'ought' to learn while students grapple with the more fundamental issues of
learning our language and guessing at our mental models. Books compensate
by giving samples of how to solve every type of homework problem.
Professors compensate by giving homework and tests that are much easier
than the material 'covered' in the course, and then grading the homework
and tests on a scale that requires little understanding. We assume the
problem is with students rather than communication: that the students
either don't have what it takes, or else just don't care. Outsiders are
amazed at this phenomenon, but within the mathematical community, we
dismiss it with shrugs."

Later I read Saunders MacLane's idea that
"intuition-trial-error-speculation-conjecture-proof
is a sequence for understanding of mathematics."
Then I realized what Rubel was talking about because little of MacLane's
sequence is present in any math grad or undergrad course that I am aware of.

I would like to see lots of discussion on the topic of trying to make the
math we teach more like the math we do.

If we can pull this off, the points made by Rubel, Thurston and MacLane
will be addressed. And once again math courses will be exciting and the
students will come.


-Jerry Uhl

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Uhl juhl@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Professor of Mathematics 1409 West Green Street
University of Illinois Urbana,Illinois 61801
Calculus&Mathematica Development Team
http://www-cm.math.uiuc.edu
http://www-cm.math.uiuc.edu/dep


"Probably the best thing that Calculus&Mathematica offered me were the
tools and the confidence to attack problems that I would never ever think
to do by hand. "

---C&M alum and current Cal Tech grad student Justin Gallivan







Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.