Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Replies: 26   Last Post: Feb 19, 1999 1:29 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
John F Harper

Posts: 214
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Posted: Feb 18, 1999 2:27 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply



In article <36cbbb97.321739269@news.newsguy.com>,
Quentin Grady <quentin@inhb.co.nz> wrote:
>This response CC'd by email
> On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 17:18:59 GMT,
>jsavard@tenMAPSONeerf.edmonton.ab.ca (John Savard) wrote:
>

>>quentin@inhb.co.nz (Quentin Grady) wrote, in part:
>>

>>> 15 + 6
>>>-------
>>> 3 + 4


>>Similarly with the radical sign for square roots.

A problem there is the difference between what LaTeX calls \surd and
\sqrt. If I represent the radical sign with no horizontal bar (vinculum)
after it by / as ASCII has nothing better, then \surd x + a looks like

/x + a. That has a faint air of ambiguity about it, dispelled by either
\sqrt{x}+a or \sqrt{x+a} which puts a vinculum over what it needs to:
_ _____
/x + a or /x + a, equal to 4,2 respectively if x = 1, a = 3.

You may of course also use /(x) + a or /(x+a).

John Harper, School of Mathematical and Computing Sciences,
Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand
e-mail john.harper@vuw.ac.nz phone (+64)(4)463 5341 fax (+64)(4)463 5045






Date Subject Author
2/17/99
Read Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/17/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Jake Wildstrom
2/18/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/17/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
John Savard
2/18/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/18/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
John F Harper
2/17/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
John Rickard
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/17/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Ailc1
2/17/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Keith Ramsay
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Gus Gassmann
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Zdislav V. Kovarik
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/17/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Darren Lo
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/17/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Janus xPuN
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/17/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
John F Harper
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/17/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Virgil Hancher
2/18/99
Read Grouping Rules (Was: Implied brackets...)
kaimbridge@my-dejanews.com
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Quentin Grady
2/18/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Robert Hill
2/19/99
Read Re: Implied brackets, are they really there?
Bill Taylor

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.