Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: [No Subject]
Replies: 4   Last Post: Sep 19, 1997 12:27 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Tad Watanabe Posts: 442 Registered: 12/6/04
Posted: Sep 19, 1997 8:50 AM

I had the same question John had when I read Steve's initial post. But,
even then why would "/" indiate the grouping of (4)(8) but not (4)(8) +
4? Is that because we have parentheses around 4 and 8? Of course, if
"/" meant the fraction bar, we wouldn't have this confusion if we write
the fraction without using "/". There won't be any question of grouping
if it was written

64
_______
(4)(8).

By the way, if you enter 64/(4)(8) + 4 to TI-83 as it appears, you get
132, and calculators are always correct, right? :-)

Towson University
Towson, Maryland

On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, John Carnahan wrote:

> Steve,
> In reply to your question about simplifying 64/(4)(8) + 4, it depends on
> whether you mean 64 divided by 4 then times 8 plus 4 or whether you mean
> the fraction 64 divided by (4 times 8) plus 4. The fraction bar is a
> grouping symbol and in the second case the simplification would be 6. I the
> first case the simlification would be 132.
> Thanks,
>
> John Carnahan
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> High School Math Teacher | School (417) 679-4200 |
> Gainesville R-V School District | Fax (417) 679-3369 |
> HC3 Box 170 | Home (870) 424-3067 |
> Gainesville, MO 65655 | fbt001@mail.connect.more.net |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Date Subject Author
9/19/97 John Carnahan