Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: Re: abstraction
Replies: 1   Last Post: Oct 14, 1995 11:27 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
David K. Pugalee

Posts: 68
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: abstraction
Posted: Oct 14, 1995 10:54 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Andrei,
Perhaps you should clarify what aspects of the standards you view as
confusing.
David K. Pugalee

On Thu, 12 Oct 1995, Andrei TOOM wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Oct 1995, Judy Roitman wrote:
>

> > I thank Andrei for his confidence in me. Less facetiously, this is a very
> > important point that Andrei has brought up -- the Standards *do* admit
> > destructive interpretations. I believe that this is inevitable. Certainly
> > the traditional approach (never written up in a Standards-type document)
> > has extremely destructive interpretations -- this is why the Standards
> > exist, as a response to the destructive interpretations of the traditional
> > approach.

>
> Yes, the Standards documents give impression that they are written
> as a protest against something. But this is a silly and confused protest.
> Like in the Russian anecdote: ``Under capitalism man exploits man,
> but under communism it is the other way round''.
>

> > All of this explains why it is extremely important to show
> > how the Standards support good mathematics education.

>
> I cannot imagine that such an immature confusion can support
> good education. Honestly, Judy, you should admit that any
> more or less competent mathematician (including you and me,
> for example) can write a better text. The reason why we don't
> do it is that it is difficult to write a really good text.
> And we are not so silly that to publish something just
> because it is better than these childish `Standards'.
>
> Andrei Toom toom@the-college.iwctx.edu
>
>





Date Subject Author
10/14/95
Read Re: abstraction
David K. Pugalee
10/14/95
Read Re: Standards
Andre TOOM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.