|
|
Re: Manipulatives
Posted:
Apr 8, 1995 3:48 PM
|
|
"...it doesn't say not to use manipulatives, just to use them well." This, too, is the point that Ball makes quite elegantly (IMHO) in the article I recommended a couple days ago! :)
____________________________________________________________ Angie S. Eshelman 116 Erickson Hall Office: (517) 353-0628 Michigan State University E-Mail: eshelma2@studente.msu.edu East Lansing, MI 48824-1034 ____________________________________________________________
At 11:38 AM 4/7/95, roitman@oberon.math.ukans.edu wrote: >Tad's response ... reflects a serious concern, but it doesn't say >not to use manipulatives, just to use them well. > >----------------------------------- > >>This may be a reply that you aren't expecting, but here it goes. >> >>I had a chance to talk with someone (who remains anonymous just in case >>I'm completely mis-interpreting her view) during a conference for math ed >>researchers. She is a very strong follower of Piaget/Constructivism and >>she has been involved in curriculum development for elementary grade >>levels for quite some time. Her curriculum is full of activities/games >>and very little, if any worksheets (in the traditional sense) or drills. >>However, she told me (and I think she was making a rather strong >>statement to emphasize her point) that she did not like manipulatives. >>Her reason, however, was very sound, in my opinion. She said that she >>had seen too many teachers use manipulatives in a very >>directed/prescribed ways so that children were not engaged in >>exploration or experimentation. Children were simply pushing "blocks" >>instead of pencils. I think she has a very good point. Too many of >>pre-service teachers I work with believe manipulatives are so wonderful, >>but have very little idea why, and they know little how to use them >>constructively. So, the concerns expressed by "the Omaha Public School >>are" may be legitimate. On the other hand, I wonder what they expect >>teachers to do to teach mathematics to young children. I wonder what the >>definition of "manipulatives" is. >> >> Tad Watanabe
|
|