The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Integrated Math: My teacher sucks, HELP!
Replies: 3   Last Post: Oct 18, 1998 5:01 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Lou Talman

Posts: 876
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Integrated Math: My teacher sucks, HELP!
Posted: Oct 2, 1998 1:53 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Tom Curtis wrote:

> I have made this conclusion because the book, although filled with
> many annoying story problems, teaches what it is supposed to teach it
> just takes a lot more brain power than it used to. The fact is, the
> teacher doesn't explain any of it before she assigns it,

This doesn't bother me very much. When a student complains that his
teacher didn't "explain any of it," there is room for a great deal of
doubt. I wasn't there, and my idea of a good explanation might be very
different from the student's idea. A relevant question here might be
"Was he as prepared as he should have been?" Students who aren't where
they should be might not even recognize an explanation for what it is.
Another relevant question might be "Was he paying attention?"

There are lots of very good reasons for not giving much credit to a
student's complaint without personally investigating what happens in
that student's classroom. After all, students must do many things that
they don't like or want to do, and that simple fact could very well be
the basis for their complaints. And, Tom, if you follow Ralph Raimi's
advice, you will have to be prepared to deal with all of those reasons.

And it's really even worse than that. There are very good reasons to
believe that many students don't get explanations until they've failed
to solve problems that the explanations might've been aimed at, and so
are primed for the explanations. You will also have to be prepared to
deal with the possibility that your teacher is someone who believes this
and can make a good case that that's what's going on in her classroom.

> and doesn't
> go over it after we turn it in. So we have no clue if we what we are
> doing or if we are doing it right.

This, on the other hand, is inexcusable. If you can convince your
principal that this is really happening, then you've got a compelling
case that your teacher really isn't doing her job. But don't
exaggerate. Don't say that your teacher "never" goes over your work
unless it's really *never*. Don't say that your teacher "doesn't go
over your work" if about one out of five assignments doesn't get
returned; say "My teacher doesn't return about one-fifth of my
homework." It is *extremely* important that you be accurate here,
because the teacher will get the benefit of any doubt that your
mis-statements may raise.

Maybe you should consider talking to a *neutral* teacher (who teaches at
another school) before you talk to your principal. If you can convince
that person--who will know what kinds of questions your principal will
ask you--then you will be well-prepared for the real thing.

--Lou Talman

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.