The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: times table discussion
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Ralph A. Raimi

Posts: 326
Registered: 12/3/04
times table discussion
Posted: Feb 5, 1998 10:19 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


Don Ellicott <ellicott@swnebr.NET> wrote us as follows:

"...
By the way, both of my children have or will learn the times tables

but

I don't think they memorized them by rote. Every so often the older
one will explain some concept behind his understanding of the times tables
to the other.

" After some reflection I think that is true of most of my "good" math
students. Very few of them rely on rote learning. They have many
facts memorized

but

they have retained them and use them because they have some understanding
of the why behind the fact"

--------------------

[RAR now:] As you see, I have made use of some technology to
display this message a bit unusually. The occurrence of "but" in these
statements lends a flavor to memorization that ought not to be there, as
if some excuse were needed when an (otherwise) sensible person memorizes
something.

Of course we have all memorized many thousands of English words,
even though the technology that in some sense makes this unnecessary has
been in place a long time, with Gutenberg's invention, and Noah Webster's,
only two of the achievements in this development.

I have known many actors, fine actors whose understanding of their
roles on stage will move you to tears, and who have played dozens of parts
in their time, and who with each new role -- and even a repeat of
an old one played before -- have to spend hours memorizing their parts,
parts which they already understand pretty well, but which they will
understand even better once they get on stage and are able to try them
with the book no longer in their hands.

Nobody has ever asked an actor to memorize a part without
understanding it. Nobody has ever asked an actor not to memorize his
part. Nobody should ever ask a child to memorize a fact without
understanding it. Nobody should ever ask a child not to memorize
something.

In all my life I have never had occasion to be sorry I learned
something, whether a memorized fact or an intricate theory. With better
discipline, self-discipline included but not exclusively, how much more
could I have learned, and how much happier could I have been!

Ralph A. Raimi





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.